{"id":661,"date":"2013-02-13T15:41:39","date_gmt":"2013-02-13T20:41:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/?p=661"},"modified":"2015-05-01T09:07:59","modified_gmt":"2015-05-01T13:07:59","slug":"a-new-look-at-the-election-map","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/?p=661","title":{"rendered":"A new look at the election map"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Many of you have probably seen one form or another of the U.S. election results maps in the last decade, showing\u00a0red vs. blue states (or counties), with areas won by the republican candidate shaded in red and those by the democratic candidate in blue.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_662\" style=\"width: 522px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/statemap512.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-662\" class=\"size-full wp-image-662\" title=\"Map of 2012 Presidential election results by state\" src=\"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/statemap512.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"512\" height=\"341\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/statemap512.png 512w, https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/statemap512-300x199.png 300w, https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/statemap512-450x300.png 450w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-662\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">State by state U.S. Presidential election results, 2012 <\/br>Source: http:\/\/www-personal.umich.edu\/~mejn\/election\/2012\/<\/p><\/div>\n<p>It&#8217;s easy to be &#8216;misled&#8217; by a map, however, in this case because the colors are applied to states that have very different characteristics (area, total population, population density, and population distribution). The red &#8211; vs &#8211; blue areas appear to be about equal (and it <em>was<\/em> a close election) but the map is not as factual as it could be. Is it more accurate to show results on a county by county basis?<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_667\" style=\"width: 522px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/countymaprb512.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-667\" class=\"size-full wp-image-667\" title=\"Map of 2012 Presidential election results by county\" src=\"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/countymaprb512.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"512\" height=\"345\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/countymaprb512.png 512w, https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/countymaprb512-300x202.png 300w, https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/countymaprb512-445x300.png 445w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-667\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">County-level results for the 2012 U.S. Presidential election <\/br>Source: http:\/\/www-personal.umich.edu\/~mejn\/election\/2012\/<\/p><\/div>\n<p>On this map, the red areas vastly outnumber the blue, giving the appearance of a republican victory. Clearly, looking at the results using counties instead of states does not produce a more accurate map. What&#8217;s missing? <strong>Population density.<\/strong><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_677\" style=\"width: 586px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/chris-map__.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-677\" class=\"size-full wp-image-677\" title=\"Election results mediated by population density\" src=\"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/chris-map__.jpg\" alt=\"Election results mediated by population density\" width=\"576\" height=\"386\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/chris-map__.jpg 576w, https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/chris-map__-300x201.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/chris-map__-447x300.jpg 447w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 576px) 100vw, 576px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-677\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Election results mediated by population density.<\/br>Source: http:\/\/www.theatlanticcities.com\/politics\/2012\/11\/political-map-weve-been-waiting\/3908\/<\/p><\/div>\n<p>In the above map, the darkness of each color indicates how densely populated a county is. The vast areas of the Great Plains are very sparsely populated, appearing almost white in some parts, whereas the urban centers on the west and east coasts (look at Long Island), as well as in the Great Lakes, have much higher populations and are therefore very dark.<\/p>\n<p>If you are interested in seeing more examples of these maps, I suggest you explore the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theatlanticcities.com\/politics\/2012\/11\/political-map-weve-been-waiting\/3908\/\">article<\/a> showcasing the population density map at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theatlanticcities.com\/\">The Atlantic Cities<\/a>, Mark Newman&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www-personal.umich.edu\/~mejn\/election\/2012\/\">election web site<\/a> (U of Michigan), or Robert Vanderbei&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.princeton.edu\/~rvdb\/JAVA\/election2012\/\">maps of the 2012 election<\/a> (Princeton). At these sites you will find <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/?p=417\">cartograms<\/a>, county maps shaded to show voter split (purples where the vote was close to 50-50), animations, and more.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Many of you have probably seen one form or another of the U.S. election results maps in the last decade, showing\u00a0red vs. blue states (or counties), with areas won by the republican candidate shaded in red and those by the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/?p=661\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,10],"tags":[89,88,24],"class_list":["post-661","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-information","category-publications","tag-89","tag-election","tag-maps"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=661"}],"version-history":[{"count":32,"href":"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/661\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":665,"href":"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/661\/revisions\/665"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gis.mtu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}